Growli
UK guide

app comparison

PictureThis vs Pl@ntNet UK 2026 — which wins here?

Pl@ntNet is free and built on European flora; PictureThis has the bigger catalogue behind a subscription. For British plants, the honest answer is not the one you expect.

Growli editorial team · 26 Jul 2026

Most "best plant app" lists rank these two by feature count. That is the wrong axis for a British gardener. What matters here is which flora each app was trained on, and whether you need a name once or advice all season.

The short verdict

Pl@ntNet wins on British plants. It is a research project before it is a product. The database is community-contributed and expert-verified, it holds 1.47 billion images, and its European coverage is the deepest part of it. If you are identifying something growing in a hedgerow, a verge, or an established British garden, this is the one to reach for first.

PictureThis wins on breadth and polish. It is the app most people mean when they say "the plant app" — a large consumer catalogue, a fast interface, and care information attached to each result. In the UK App Store it holds 4.75 stars across more than 165,000 ratings, which is a genuine signal about the experience even if it says nothing about botanical accuracy.

Neither wins on what happens next. Both answer "what is this?" Neither answers "it is August, this is a north-facing Manchester flat, what do I do about the yellowing?"

Side-by-side

Pl@ntNetPictureThis
CostFree — no paywall, no trial, no premium tierFree to download; identification behind a subscription
Run byCIRAD, INRAE, INRIA, IRD (French public research)A commercial developer
Database84,710 species, 1.47bn images, 77 florasLarge consumer catalogue
Strongest onEuropean flora — the project's origin regionHouseplants and ornamentals
UK App Store ratingNot directly comparable (smaller rating base)4.75 from 165,000+ ratings
AdsAd-supportedSubscription-supported
Open sourceYesNo

On pricing we are deliberately vague, and you should be suspicious of articles that are not. App Store subscription prices vary by storefront and change without notice, and we have no way to verify a UK figure that will still be right when you read this. Pl@ntNet is free — that we can state, because the project says so and there is no paid tier to change. For PictureThis, open its App Store listing and read the in-app purchase list. Any article quoting you an exact figure to the penny is copying another article.

Why the European flora point matters more than it sounds

Identification models are only as good as what they were trained on. Pl@ntNet grew out of French research institutions cataloguing European plants, and that is still where its data is densest — which maps closely onto what grows in British gardens, verges and woodland.

This shows up in practice on the plants that are hardest to tell apart: umbellifers, grasses, brambles, willows, the hawthorn-blackthorn confusion. A model with deep European data and expert verification behind it has simply seen more correctly-labelled British examples.

It cuts the other way for houseplants. A Monstera cultivar or an unusual Calathea is a consumer-catalogue problem, and that is PictureThis territory.

Where both fall short for a UK gardener

Neither knows your conditions. An identification is climate-blind. It cannot tell you that the plant you have just named is borderline in your postcode, or that it will need protection by October.

Neither reads a symptom in context. Photograph a yellowing leaf and you get the species, not the diagnosis. The cause — overwatering, a cold windowsill, spider mites, a nutrient gap — depends on the season, the room and what you did last month.

Neither speaks RHS. British hardiness runs on RHS ratings H1a to H7, not USDA zones. An app that reports a USDA zone is asking you to do a conversion in your head every time.

How to decide

That last case is what Growli is built for: identification, then a conversational thread that remembers your garden, works natively in RHS hardiness ratings, and warns you before a frost rather than after it. It is not a better identifier than Pl@ntNet on British flora, and we would rather say so than pretend otherwise.

Common mistakes

Subscribing to solve a problem a free app already solves. If you only need names, Pl@ntNet is free and strong on exactly the plants you are most likely to be pointing at in Britain.

Trusting one identification of a lookalike. For umbellifers especially — where the difference between species matters a great deal — confirm against a second source before acting on it.

Photographing the wrong thing. Both apps do better with a leaf, a flower and the whole plant than with a single close-up. Bark and leaf arrangement matter for trees.

Expecting an identifier to be a care app. They are different products. Naming a plant is one moment; keeping it alive is a season.

Related reading


Reviewed and updated by the Growli editorial team. For questions about anything here, open Growli and ask — or email hello@getgrowli.app.

Frequently asked questions

Is Pl@ntNet completely free in the UK?

Yes. Pl@ntNet has no paywall, no trial and no premium tier — it is ad-supported and open source, run by four French public research institutes (CIRAD, INRAE, INRIA and IRD) and funded partly by donation. This is unusual: most plant identifier apps give you a limited free allowance and then ask for a subscription.

Which is more accurate for British plants?

Pl@ntNet, in most cases. Its database holds 84,710 species across 77 regional floras and its deepest coverage is European flora, which is where the project originated — that maps closely onto British gardens and countryside. A peer-reviewed comparison found Pl@ntNet among the top performers tested, correctly identifying 80-90% of species. PictureThis tends to do better on houseplants and unusual ornamentals, where the question is a consumer catalogue one rather than a botanical one.

How much does PictureThis cost in the UK?

The app is free to download and puts identification behind a subscription. We deliberately do not quote a figure: App Store subscription prices differ by storefront and change without notice, and an article that names a price to the penny is usually copying another article rather than checking. Open the App Store listing and read the in-app purchase list — that is the only reliable source, and it takes a few seconds.

Do I need to pay for a plant identifier app at all?

No. Pl@ntNet is genuinely free and strong on British flora, which covers most of what a UK gardener actually points a camera at. Paying makes sense if you are regularly identifying houseplants and unusual ornamentals, where a larger consumer catalogue helps, or if you want care guidance bundled with the identification.

Does either app understand RHS hardiness ratings?

Neither is built around them. British hardiness runs on RHS ratings from H1a (heated greenhouse) to H7 (very hardy, below -20C), and an app reporting USDA zones leaves you converting in your head. If hardiness is the reason you are identifying the plant, see our guide to UK hardiness zones.

Can I use both?

That is the sensible setup, and it costs nothing extra. Pl@ntNet for anything growing outdoors in Britain, PictureThis for houseplants if you already subscribe. Most UK gardeners end up with one identifier and one care app rather than trying to make a single app do both jobs.

Why does Pl@ntNet sometimes return several possible species?

Because it is showing you its confidence rather than hiding it. It is a research project, and returning a ranked shortlist for a genuinely ambiguous plant is more honest than picking one and sounding certain. When you see a shortlist, photograph a different part of the plant — a flower, the leaf arrangement, the bark — and identify again.

Related articles

More from App Comparison